Originally, I was going to post on dumb budget moves the Milwaukee Public Schools are making and the the stale plan the teacher’s union proposed for fixing the schools.
I don’t have time for that.
Here is my from scratch plan for the Wisconsin (and National) Education System. I wrote it down several years ago pre-blogs. I don’t have all of the sources that may have inspired me (but I will list them if they are brought to my attention).
Goal: A better, more efficient Educational System
that utilizes American Strengths and Values. Education is too important to America’s future to not be treated as a national issue.
a. Funding Equalization
i. Equalization of K4/K5/1-12 funding.
ii. Federal per-pupil education vouchers.
b. Customized Individual Programs for every student
i. Idea Based upon Special Ed IEP (individual Education Program)
ii. Year round programs.
c. Mass Customization:
i. Multitudes of choices, options, styles, sizes, variety, niches, and possibilities in education service delivery.
ii. Let a hundred experiments bloom. Replicate what works, and junk what doesn’t
d. Private system with strict public accountability
i. Charter Schools everywhere for everybody (essentially a mega-charter school system)
ii. Choice
iii. Public Reporting and auditing (academic and financial).
iv. Need an Internet based, system that is like a cross between Ginny Mae and Freddie Mac, crossed with eBay or Amazon.com’s feedback system, crossed with consumer
reports that is available to all, with education service consumers reporting on education service providers with infrastructure provided by regional government
sponsored enterprises (GSE). Have several GSE (5-15). They can be geographically unique areas of responsibility for first three years. After that they can compete with each other. Eventually they would consolidate into 3-5 GSE.
v. Zero tolerance for troublemakers (the real troublemakers, not those that are the victims of the troublemakers). Create alternate environments for the bad apples.
e. Professional Excellence
i. No Residency rules for teachers, staff and administrators.
ii. Pay teachers more, pay also for performance in exchange for accountability
1. Increase pay 40% – 60%
2. Additional bonus pay on performance
i. Value-added
metrics
ii. Whole-school
metrics
iii. Peer-review
iv. 360-student
review
3. Job security and tenure goes away
iii. To transition, make this a parallel personnel system. All new teachers go into the new system, along with any old teachers who want to.
iv. The USA needs the education profession equivalent of the IEEE (either a new
organization or an organization morphed from former national teachers unions)
v. Grow a new teaching culture
vi. Apprenticeships for new teachers. Structure the first two-years of teaching like an internship in medicine, with the new teacher consulting with a master teacher and receiving constant feedback, ongoing advice, regular evaluation, advice, and
further development.
vii. Career-long professional development programs to nurture and stimulate great teachers.
viii. Alternative Paths to teacher certification.
f. Basic skills for all students demonstrated with a federally sponsored American Primary Education Certification and American Secondary Education Certification.
i.Learning how to learn
ii. American Civics, Democracy, and Citizenship
iii. History & Moral philosophy
iv.Ethics
v. Lifetime fitness, nutrition, and wellness
vi.Basic skills: reading, writing, mathematics, and science
vii.Academics
viii. Job skills
ix.Communication, rhetoric, and logic
x. Economics,statistics and personal finance
xi.Life-long learning, creativity, and problem-solving skills
xii.Organizing and Leadership
xiii.Personal time & task management
xiv.First aid, life saving, and emergency preparedness
xv.Fine Arts performance and appreciation
xvi.Conflict resolution and self-defense
xvii. Legal system basics (see examples from http://www.streetlaw.org)
xviii. No teaching of creation science (or “Intelligent Design” or whatever else it is
called) and other idiotarian pseudo-sciences as science.
I would vote for any candidate that signed onto something like this.
Update: I think some of the teacher pay stuff was inspired by a book caleld the 2% solution (or perhaps I just heard an interview with the author).
Update 11/6/2008: Teaching service delivery will most likely need to adopt an industrial model (at least in some options) to get gains in productivity and efficiency.
RSS
No, education must never be part of the Federal government. And without an amendment, it is not constitutional. (Congressman Ron Paul has pointed this out.) Until then, centralized education is a poor model to children whose parents want them to respect the law.
Experiments blooming is a good idea. For example homeschoolers have contributed a lot in the knowledge of multisensory education.
Privatization is good. This puts control back into the hands of parents.
The banning of ID is inconsistent with most of the other ideas.
I like the list of basic skills, but the list needs to be based on the market and driven by parents. Certs are fine, they can be private and for the time state. But they cannot be federal.
Missing is the primary and core role of parents. Where it is lacking, many guys, individually and in clubs, are encouraging fathers to make learning imporant in their families. I commend that. It is the mom who typically teaches a child to read. Parents are responsible to setting educational goals and needs.
The merits of teaching depends on a lot of factors and I would not agree to one-size-fits all. I do encourage teachers to be come professionals, and to kick out deadbeat comrades.
Thanks for the thoughts! There are some good ideas here.
By: Scott on June 6, 2007
at 2:06 pm
“And without an amendment, it is not constitutional. “.
Agreed.
Wisconsin (my State) could implement this across the state.
Thanks for the feedback.
By: purpleslog on June 6, 2007
at 6:52 pm
Very good plan, PSlog.
I believe that education should absolutely be equalized, vis-a-vis funding (or per-pupil vouchers) but also with Federal oversight over teacher certification (just setting the lowest acceptable standards, which should be fairly high) and minimum wages for teachers (above the normal minimum wage, of course!) Mostly, this federal oversight fits with your idea for public accountability; however, I would want only the barest minimums set at the federal level, basic guidelines. Although an amendment to the Constitution would be required for a federally run educational system, I believe that ensuring equality in educational opportunity and educational standards between districts, for all Americans, is already a part of the Constitution.
I wouldn’t mind seeing income tax breaks (deductions, perhaps) for professionals in other fields who also commit time to teaching classes on subjects within their field. This would not only help in the “mass customization” you propose, but would bring school “out of the classroom,” so to speak, and might give kids a window view into what to expect when they leave school.
Strongly agree with your first four “basic skills.” Civics especially is lacking in many (most?) districts or is only given a cursory examination. Moral philosophy and ethics are essential; however, here you run into combat with those who wish to shove their religion into the educational system. My sympathy with IDers only goes this far: I do believe that all perspectives should belong within the pupil’s educational experience, including ID. But these perspectives need to be explored with a heavy dose of skepticism. (If it’s a skepticism that leads to belief, after being thoroughly and fairly addressed, that’s fine, as long as that decision is left to the individual student.)
By: Curtis Gale Weeks on June 8, 2007
at 2:17 am
BTW, I strongly disagree with Scott’s emphasis on parents, for two primary reasons:
1. Many, perhaps most parents, simply don’t care, as long as their kids return a passable grade on their report cards. Allowing parents to have a strong say in which school their kids attend is fine, and I would support that. But the mythical “Father knows best” argument has no basis in fact for most families. Their children will be living in a different world by the time they graduation; i.e., different than the world the parents have known. So when Scott says, “but the list needs to be based on the market and driven by parents” I absolutely disagree, without reservation, except to the degree that those parent also exercise their civic duty through the vote, protest, and so forth, and have their say heard in this manner.
2. As we have seen, parents may often be quite busy living their own lives. In the backward-looking dream reality, parents would be parents full time, able to devote the necessary time, energy, etc. (including researching all the possibilities, if necessary.) No doubt, some parents will fit the archetypal ideal, and many will fit that ideal partially; but many more never will. In any case, unless one or both parent is enabled to de-network from the workforce and devote the necessary time, with incentives, I doubt we should build a latch-key educational system: This may seem like a counterintuitive metaphor, but at present the entire lack of interest and/or time seen in many parents already produces a latchkey system, where teachers and school administrators bend over backward to avoid upsetting parents — thus avoiding many of the necessary changes you outline — while parents avoid becoming very active in their children’s education.
I do not, however, think parents should be entirely shut out of the educational system. In any case, I believe most parents look forward to leaving their children in capable hands (what is the prestigious private school if not such a case? or the “day-care” variety public school) and the “Father knows best” reaction is merely a reaction against sub-standard or pitiful “hands” being forced upon them.
By: Curtis Gale Weeks on June 8, 2007
at 2:36 am
very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
Idetrorce
By: Idetrorce on December 15, 2007
at 5:31 am
That’s ok Idetroce. Feel free to share your idea. I would be interested in hearing them.
By: purpleslog on December 16, 2007
at 8:23 am
TDAXP has a related post here:
http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/07/11/no-child-left-behind-the-quantitative-revolution-applied-to-publi-schools.html
By: purpleslog on July 13, 2008
at 12:07 pm
…and here:
http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/11/03/science-technology-engineering-mathematics.html
By: purpleslog on November 6, 2008
at 1:12 pm
I seriously think they should be teaching kids two things.
1. How to use violence and all the social taboos dealing with such things as murder and cannibalism and why they exist. Not just the use of firearms but the knowledge of why “violence works”. Why it often you have one guy doing it and one guy receiving it and this state of things never really changes.
2. The usage of propaganda and psychological warfare and how to defend against them.
The system, of course, will need re-tooling but those two subjects are something I think every six year could benefit from learning. Course, we’ll hold back on the “goodies” until they are 12 or something.
By: Ymarsakar on November 6, 2008
at 3:20 pm
I think the first would come under History and Moral Philosophy which should be taught.
The second I didn’t think of but it is a good idea, especially in the larger context of noticing manipulation and sales techniques. Yep, this would be good to add. Think soft self-defense.
By: purpleslog on November 6, 2008
at 4:08 pm
A lot of the problems I see with critical thinking, which people may want to supplement my Two with, is “how do you judge whether it is critical thinking or not”? Somebody has to judge. Who gets to do it? Who gets to shape the dynamics and the standards? Who gets to instruct and smack down people who think differently or incorrectly?
In engineering, it is a simple matter since if you aren’t thinking critically you may just blow your employer up in an electric generator meltdown. Or the project goes kaput. Or the stuff doesn’t work. There’s some critical thinking for ya. Some objective standards.
In war, the same is true. Make a wrong decision and your employees aren’t fired, they are dead and maybe roasted in hell fire as well before they die. That kind of consequences makes for pretty efficient “critical thinking”, yanno.
But in schools? In fracking academia where they can’t rub two matchsticks together for fear of creating a bomb/terrorist/fire alert? What the heck are they going to base their “critical thinking” on except illusion, fantasy, and crack like that.
Propaganda at least has the benefit that you can clearly see it in history, if you know what to look for, and can structure your lessons based upon that.
By: Ymarsakar on November 6, 2008
at 4:27 pm
My number one would also tend to cut down on child molestations once the good stuff are shown to the kids.
Course, that won’t be necessary since Obama will protect all our children for us.
By: Ymarsakar on November 6, 2008
at 4:28 pm
Did Kennedy name it “No Child Left Behind” in order to maybe atone for the fact that he left that girl behind in his underwater car?
By: Ymarsakar on November 6, 2008
at 4:32 pm
On the child molestation…I don’t know if #1 would cut it down. I think child molestation is mostly by people who know the kid and I bet it is more of a psyop on the kid as a prelude to the actual physical molestation (and then continuing afterward). So, maybe #2 would help.
I never understood how Kennedy got elected again after that. Or again and again. Or to leadership positions. Or almost a presidential; nominee. Mass is a fucked up state.
By: purpleslog on November 7, 2008
at 6:08 am
For elaboration on what I mean by 1, I’m talking about a program like this one.
Link
It will make it harder for kids to be kidnapped since a gross physical injury to the kidnapper is going to make it hard for the kid to disappear without a trace. Also hard for the guy to be operating in normal life without being identified.
By: ymarsakar on November 8, 2008
at 12:16 am
First time I actually read this, great ideas. Very adaptable to fit the model in a certain area. I’ll run this over some older friends who are in the teaching field right now.
Intelligent Design, or Creationism 2.0 is NOT real science. While I understand many religious people have an apprehension(or irrational fear) of evolution the facts on the ground remain the same.
By: glennanderson on November 24, 2008
at 11:04 am
Thanks!
The Intelligent Design, or Creation Science stuff bothers me becuase there are limits to how much instruction someone can get. I see no reason to take time away from legitimate math/science to Intelligent Design or Creation Science. I feel no need to coddle the “true believers” in this.
By: purpleslog on November 24, 2008
at 11:27 am
THe Left and atheism have an irrational fear of other people’s religion. The opposite is only true for the Islamic JIhad, not American Christianity.
By: Ymarsakar on November 25, 2008
at 4:31 pm
I feel no need to coddle the “true believers” in this.
Vouchers are not “coddling” the true believers in this. For it will be taken out of your hands and won’t impact your choices as parent.
But that was opposed by Democrats precisely because it would allow more freedom of choice. An irrational fear of liberty by those in power should be more important to citizens of a nation than what the religious beliefs and education requirements of other people in that nation.
By: Ymarsakar on November 25, 2008
at 4:34 pm
The replacement of science education with education in the fake sciences of “Intelligent Design or Creation Science” is harmful for the future well-being of the US.
So much of our future wealth will be dependent upon proper mastery of the sciences that the diluting of that I do not tolerate its introduction.
If parents want to teach their kids fake science at home, we can’t do anything about that.
By: purpleslog on November 26, 2008
at 10:16 am