CAIR is the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood front

From Pajamasmedia:

SM: Is there a Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S.?

Mohamed Habib: I would say yes. There are Muslim Brotherhood members there.

SM: Then what are they doing there?

Mohamed Habib: No, there are already existing institutions; there
are laws and a constitution that they operate under in order to have a
role in serving the American society. They are part of the American
society and they want to an active positive role in it, and a part of
that is to spread a positive image of Islam along with its values,
culture, history and teachings.

SM: This is naturally very important. Who represents you in the US?

Mohamed Habib: Well, there are there those who do represent us, who do that role.

SM: But it’s not CAIR, right? The Council for American Islamic
Relations? Many people say that they are your front. Other people say
that its ISNA. But back to CAIR, some people from the Muslim
Brotherhood have denied having a connection with CAIR. Do they really
represent you?

Mohamed Habib: Ehh, this is a sensitive subject, and it’s kind of problematic, especially after 9/11 …

SM: For them to say that there is a relationship between you two?

Mohamed Habib: Yes. You can say that.

That’s not a denial.

Mohammed Habib is the current #2 (and a possible future Supreme Leader) of the 4GW/5GW Muslem Brotherhood.

About these ads

16 Responses

  1. Oh xenophobia. What is silly mindset to have.

  2. Sub…what exactly was xenophobic?

    I don’t really expect you to answer.

    What you are doing is a common tactic. You are claiming my post is xenophobic (or racist or sexist, or some other bad thing), hoping to shame me and discourage others from digesting the post. This is common tactic of the left and have been picket up by islamofascists and the anti-anti-islamofascist.

    Note to anybody reading this – “sub” did not dispute the facts. He/she wants you to ignore the facts.

  3. haha. Good one.

    Your right, I presume. I am sure you have no malice towards Muslims, and that’s why you don’t have a link of the Muhammad Cartoons on your blog. Oh wait…

    silly. Yes, the South lost…but get over it son.

  4. “malice towards Muslims”

    I think most Muslims are getting a raw deal. They have been suckered by their medieval-minded clerics and self-enriching leaders so that their societies are vast wastelands of human misery and wasted potential.

    Question: Do you think Sharia and totalitarian leaders are a good thing though? Does your answer make you pro-Muslim or anti-Muslim? Do you think Sharia should spread to the West and to the US? Does this make you anti-freedom?

    “link of the Muhammad Cartoons”

    So what? I don’t care if a some medieval-minded clerics can connive and cower some in the west from dropping the support and practice of western values like freedom of the press, freedom of expression, and freedom of speech. I haven’t given up on those values. Now if the drawings were crude pornography, I wouldn’t have linked to them. The drawings were not though.

    Question for you: What do think is wrong with the drawings? Why do you think I should not link to them? What do think it says about me? Why have most “Muslim” nations signed the UN Declaration of Universal Rights”?

    “the South lost…but get over it son”.

    I have never lived in the south. I am from and live in Wisconsin. The Badger state was part of the union. Along with fellow new “western” state Minnesota, Wisconsin had the highest per capita of males serving in the Union Army. The south absolutely lost though you might say won or at least had a draw on the post 2GW reconstruction era 4GW. We don’t know how things would have worked out in Lincoln’s 2nd term (or even maybe an eventual third term). Reconstruction would have been messy still, but perhaps the North wouldn’t have grown weary of it.

    Anyways, the Confederacy was ugly and surely needed to loose. The Union was lucky that it had a leader like Lincoln, and that Lincoln was finally able to find Generals like Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan (heh and BrigGeneral Arthur MacArthur MoH winner from Wisconsin).

    Question: Do you think if someone is opposed to misery-producing Sharia being slowly introduced in the US by overt and covert measures (e.g. the Brotherhood via CAIR) that makes them a racist or a xenophobe or a neo-confederate? How do you define racism? How do you define xenophobia? Are you pro-Sharia? Are you against Sharia being introduced in the US?

    Final Question, do dispute the fact of the Brotherhood’s possible future leader’s admission CAIR is a front for the Brotherhood, or are you just going to call me a racist or xenophobe again?

  5. way to prove my point by going on a senseless rant about things that have nothing to do with the post, or my comment to it.

    I challenge you to name 3 things, no 2, okay…just 1 thing that CAIR has pushed that somehow shows that they have even attempted to bring ‘Sharia law’ into the United States.

    Can you?

  6. Hello I would like to invite you to visit our website : http://www.ikhwanweb.com/

    IKhwanweb is the Muslim Brotherhood”s only official English web site. The Main office is located in London, although Ikhwanweb has correspondents in most countries. Our staff is exclusively made of volunteers and stretched over the five continents.
    The Muslim Brotherhood opinions and views can be found under the sections of MB statements and MB opinions, in addition to the Editorial Message.
    Items posted under “other views” are usually different from these of the Muslim Brotherhood.
    Ikhwanweb does not censor any articles or comments but has the right only to remove any inappropriate words that defy public taste
    Ikhwanweb is not a news website, although we report news that matter to the Muslim Brotherhood”s cause. Our main misson is to present the Muslim Brotherhood vision right from the source and rebut misonceptions about the movement in western societies. We value debate on the issues and we welcome constructive criticism.

    to help inform you about your subject matter,questions

    If you have any addition questions you can email us at :
    Ikhwanweb2010@gmail.com
    m_salam2525@yahoo.com
    ikhwanweb200@yahoo.com
    editor@ikhwanweb.com

  7. come up with anything yet?

  8. I haven’t had internet access at home for a few nights, so I haven’t had time to post a thoughtful reply.

    Feel free to answer any of the 5 clear and distinct questions that I asked you in the meantime.

  9. Way to ignore the question. My question is directly related to the title of your post…and it would seem that if you post something, the burden of proof is on you to back up the ridiculous claim you make.

    All I ask is for you to show me a few instances where CAIR supported a policy that would, in some ways, indicate that they were trying to implement or even bring over Sharia law.

  10. Sub:

    “Way to ignore the question.”

    I didn’t ignore it. I gave you and update that it wasn’t being ignored but that I hadn’t had time for a thoughtful reply to little direct internet connectivity from home.

    “My question is directly related to the title of your post…”

    No it itsn’t. The post points pout that I high level Brotherhood leaders admitted that CAIR was a Brotherhood front in the US. You have not disputed that.

    What you asked, after calling me a xenophobe, hinting that I hate Muslims, hinting that I am a neo-confederate, and ignoring my 5 direct questions to you was for me to give you an instance where CAIR has supported Sharia being introduced to the USA.

    You will get that when I have more then 10 minutes on the internet from home.

    I suspect you will ignore that though and make some other personal attacks on me or move on to troll some other blog.

  11. Omar: Thanks for the link. This is most likely not the site to look for readers/supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood.

  12. you really are silly. you post on a subject (the link between CAIR and Ikhwan…and than, rather than defend the specious claim you are making, you go on tirade about sharia law. If you wanted to do that, you should have just written about sharia law.

    again, when you get the chance, I would be very interested in seeing how exactly CAIR is bringing sharia law to the United States.

    Oh, and another minor issue. Part of sharia law is to respect the laws of the country in which you live in…actually, that is a large segment of sharia law. So…would you mean that by not imposing sharia law and respecting American laws…that CAIR supports sharia law? Oh man…I guess you were right all along.

  13. I feel sorry for people whose understanding Islamic concepts comes from jihad watch. That is like me basing my understanding of Catholicism based on the teachings of Jerry Faldwell. Silly.

    cheers

    Sub.

  14. Sub, I realize their is no further reason to engage with you.

    You are either not reading reading what I am writing (and that’s why you are not responding to it) or you are just playing with me.

    “…CAIR and Ikhwan…and than, rather than defend the specious claim…”

    I used the translated words of Brotherhood leader himself. I am reporting what he himself states. You have not repudiated it.

    “you go on tirade about sharia law…”

    I don’t think you understand what the word “tirade” means.

    “If you wanted to do that, you should have just written about sharia law.”

    On my blog, I right about whatever topic I wish to write about. The topic of Sharia came up when I attempted to respond to claim of “malice towards Muslims” on my part. I asked you questions related to that, which you have declined to answer or even acknowledge.

    “Part of sharia law is to respect the laws of the country…”

    I suspect you don’t know what the word “respect” means, or are purposefully using it in a deceitful way. Regardless, Sharia law in not compatible with the common law or the American legal system.

    I now realize you are not actually looking for dialogue.

  15. BTW SUB, if you want to respond to any of my questions or what I have written, I will allow those comments.

    Anything else of yours will be held until you do so.

    Since you don’t seem to want to respond to me in a constructive matter, I don’t expect anything further from you.

  16. Well, sub is continuing to send me nonsensical comments. He won’t answer my questions, and refuses to read my post…where I quote a Brotherhood leader as admitting that CAIR is a Brotherhood front.

    Note: I am not guessing that CAIR is a front. I am quoting a an interview where a leader in the Muslim Brotherhood when asked admits that CAIR is a front for the Brotherhood in the US.

    I am just reporting what they have now admitted openly. Apparently, for someone like Sub, who seems to be some sort of anti-anti-islamofascist Marxist, that little bit of truth must be schelched and drowned out with nasty accusations.

    That doesn’t work against me though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 224 other followers

%d bloggers like this: