Posted on May 30, 2011 by purpleslog
It sounds like some Computer Scientists… A team of computer scientists at two University of California campuses has been looking deeply into the nature of spam, and they think found a ‘choke point’ [PDF] that could greatly reduce the flow of spam…If a handful of companies like these refused to authorize online credit card payments [...]
Filed under: Business, Economics, Information Security, Information Technology, Lawfare, Technology and Gadgets | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 1, 2011 by purpleslog
…and clear out all of the grounds of the Leftists and throw in jail any who resist or do not comply. Fucking Leftists. I am embarrassed for my home state of Wisconsin. We shouldn’t pretend the Left and their activist vanguard and their willing public union dupes are just practicing democracy. They are [...]
Filed under: Lawfare, Milwaukee/Wisconsin, Public Policy | Tagged: Democratic, Labor Movement, Left-wing politics, Parties, Unions, United States | 7 Comments »
Posted on September 11, 2010 by purpleslog
Thanks to Eddie for the the link to http://www.lawfareblog.com.
Filed under: Lawfare, National Security | Leave a Comment »
Posted on June 7, 2010 by purpleslog
Here is a site on a topic that is of much interest to me – The Lawfare Project: What is Lawfare? Lawfare: The Use of the Law as a Weapon of War Lawfare denotes the use of the law as a weapon of war, or more specifically, the abuse of the law and legal systems [...]
Filed under: 5GW, Influence Warfare, Lawfare, National Security, The War on Islamofascism | 3 Comments »
Posted on February 24, 2010 by purpleslog
I have read with disgust the last few days about President Obama’s Justice Department having hired quite a few attorneys that had represented Gitmo detainees directly or had submitted friend-of-the-court briefs supporting the detainees. The justification of this seems to be well that is what defense attorneys do, they defend bad guys, so this is [...]
Filed under: Lawfare, National Security | 20 Comments »
Posted on October 22, 2008 by purpleslog
Found on SlashDot: …a Federal raid on a California-based motorcycle club, the Mongols, on charges “ranging from murder and robbery to extortion, money laundering, gun trafficking and drug dealing.” The interesting twist is that the authorities are asking the courts to seize the IP of the biker club — specifically, their trademarked name “Mongols.” “Federal [...]
Filed under: 4GW, Influence Warfare, Lawfare, Public Policy | Tagged: 4GW, coin, Lawfare | Leave a Comment »
Posted on October 8, 2008 by purpleslog
From Hot Air: A federal judge has ordered the release of 17 Chinese Uighers detained at Guantanamo Bay, and specifically into the US. Judge Ricardo Urbina demanded that the federal government produce them in his courtroom by Friday, and refused to stay his order for an appeal. [...]He said he would then release them into [...]
Filed under: Lawfare, Public Policy, The War on Islamofascism, Uncategorized | 9 Comments »
Posted on August 25, 2008 by purpleslog
On Tech Dirt, I saw this – “FBI Asks Congress To Ignore The Whole ‘Probable Cause’ Part Of The 4th Amendment” : So, in case you haven’t been paying attention, the text of the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and [...]
Filed under: Lawfare, U.S. Constitution | Leave a Comment »
Posted on June 20, 2008 by purpleslog
I will blog on these later, but I thought I would point them out to others for now. John Fonte (who authored the article on Transnational Progressivism) has a four-part article at familysecuritymatters.org entitled: “Global Governance vs. the Liberal Democratic Nation State: What Is the Best Regime?” 1) Who Governs 2) The Response of the [...]
Filed under: Lawfare, Public Policy | 3 Comments »
Posted on April 26, 2008 by purpleslog
Note: I have been hording these, so they are not all current.
Filed under: Lawfare | Tagged: Lawfare | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 18, 2008 by purpleslog
From Concurring Opinions: Spain’s recent indictment of 40 Rwandan army officers on international criminal charges raises interesting questions about the appropriateness of trying such cases in the domestic courts of nations with little connection to the conflict from which these crimes arose. What’s this? The charged Rwandans were not responsible for the 1994 Rwandan genocide [...]
Filed under: Lawfare | Tagged: genocide, Lawfare, rwanda, spain | 6 Comments »
Posted on December 22, 2007 by purpleslog
Prairie Pundit links to an article and comments: The left’s insistence on reversion to the Trial on Terror rather than waging war against the terrorist is a major miscalculation that will render great aid to the enemy, if not comfort too. While they may be pursuing this strategy in good faith, the demonstrable results after [...]
Filed under: Election 2008, Lawfare | Tagged: Lawfare | Leave a Comment »
Posted on September 22, 2007 by purpleslog
Wolf Pangloss writes about an incident: The kill had already been approved by the American command. And the main job of soldiers in war is to kill the enemy, which Buntangyar was. So, the American soldiers shot him. And now the lawyers have decided to prosecute them for murder. Some quick Thoughts: Why the fuck [...]
Filed under: Lawfare, National Security, Public Policy | Tagged: Future | 7 Comments »
Posted on September 13, 2007 by purpleslog
He writes: The smoke screen is by the terrorist rights advocates who are trying to reveal our sources and methods of gathering information so that the enemy can avoid future detection and preemption of its attacks. [...] This is just another example of why judges have no business interfering with the war effort. The lawfare [...]
Filed under: Lawfare | 2 Comments »
Posted on September 6, 2007 by purpleslog
While reading instapundit I saw this: Goldsmith notes that the Defense Department alone has over 10,000 lawyers, not including reservists. Unless they are in some special suicide-squad, this can’t be a good thing…it can’t be a good use of human capital resources.
Filed under: Lawfare, National Security, The War on Islamofascism | Leave a Comment »
Posted on July 21, 2007 by purpleslog
…but chose not to regarding the Flying Inmans. There are several possible whys individuals voted against the Counter-Lawfare protection: Their Cryptocalvinism Universalism ideology maneuvers them into stupid position There are afraid of Islam (and appeasement is their instinctual – their fingertip feeling – reaction) Some may be on the other side Anyways, read more here [...]
Filed under: Lawfare | Tagged: Anti-Anti-Islamofascists, cryptocalvinism, Fifth Column | Leave a Comment »
Posted on June 26, 2007 by purpleslog
So, Dick Cheney thinks he is part of the Legislative branch when it suits him. The VP is part of the executive Branch. He is not part of the legislative branch because one of his duties is to preside over the Senate. The Supreme Court Chief Justice is not a member of the legislative branch [...]
Filed under: Lawfare, Public Policy, U.S. Constitution | 2 Comments »
Posted on May 7, 2007 by purpleslog
From the Sun: A customer got so steamed when a dry cleaner lost his trousers that he sued for US$65 million. Oh yeah, the guy suing is a judge. An Asshole judge.
Filed under: Lawfare | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 24, 2007 by purpleslog
In 4GW, the use of non-Kinetic power is as important (if not more so) then kinetic power. I am fascinated by the practice of lawfare (I am not a lawyer, though law school was a mental plan B that I had and occasionally think about). It is type of legalistic judo where the rule-sets and [...]
Filed under: Lawfare | 1 Comment »
Posted on March 18, 2007 by purpleslog
From LGF: At “The American Muslim,” Issa Smith describes the plan to establish shari’a law in the United States—and yes, he is talking about shari’a for everyone: Native American Courts: Precedent for an Islamic arbitral system. (Hat tip: The Gathering Storm.) This is the violence-deferred front of the global jihad—the attempt to use our own [...]
Filed under: Lawfare | 1 Comment »
Posted on January 31, 2007 by purpleslog
Here is the link.
Filed under: Lawfare | Leave a Comment »
Posted on December 31, 2006 by purpleslog
BTW, I am listening to The Pipettes while I type this. Top 10 Businesspundit Posts of 2006 TDAXP describes the differences between Shia and Sunni Islam; [update] Catholicgauze has the maps to go with it. 5GW: “Exploring what comes next is cooler than what’s maturing now“ In “The empires of the future are the empires [...]
Filed under: 5GW, Lawfare | Tagged: linkspasm | 4 Comments »
Posted on November 25, 2006 by purpleslog
Via John Robb the New York Times writes: But now, after boasting of having captured 12,000 illegal crossers on land he owns or leases from the state and emerging as one of the earliest and most prominent of the self-appointed border watchers, Mr. Barnett finds himself the prey. Immigrant rights groups have filed lawsuits, accusing [...]
Filed under: Lawfare | Leave a Comment »
Posted on November 22, 2006 by purpleslog
Via InstaPundit: My advice to Saudis who don’t want to be accused of supporting terrorism: Get your country to stop being a major source of funds for terrorists. That’s better than engaging in legal terrorism against a free press of the sort that isn’t allowed in your own benighted country. and from LGF: Former prisoners [...]
Filed under: Lawfare | Tagged: Anti-Anti-Islamofascists | Leave a Comment »
Posted on November 19, 2006 by purpleslog
TDAXP has a written a post on Lawfare: International Law and Foreign Law are both attempts by legalistic factions who cannot impose their will democratically, so they use legal-sounding words to try to get in through the back door. The world is better off without them. Lawfare (a non-kinetic type of power) can also be [...]
Filed under: 4GW, Lawfare | Leave a Comment »