Mencius Moldbug has updated his cryptoCalvinism thesis and renamed it “Universalism”:
As UR readers have been reminded ad nauseam,
one of my many eccentric opinions is that the tradition to which most
sophisticated Westerners of 2007 conform is best seen as a sect of
Christianity. Since this tradition sees itself as a pure product of
science and reason, neither sectarian nor Christian nor even
traditional, my perspective is heretical in the strict sense of the
word. We can’t both be right.My argument is that though the
tradition is theologically atrophied, its moral and political
positions, and its personal and institutional patterns of transmission,
identify it as the legitimate modern successor of mainline progressive Protestantism.
Since this is only the most powerful branch of Christianity in the most
powerful nation on the planet, swallowing its claims of dewy-eyed
innocence is a little difficult for me.
Why the name change?
It’s simply unrealistic to expect to be able to make this revision, or
even evaluate it fairly, without adjusting the language we use to
“frame” the problem. To this end I’ve field-tested some neologisms,
such as ultracalvinism and cryptocalvinism, and also satisfied myself that existing names, such as liberalism, are just as useless and confusing as they seem.
What is it?
In a probably-vain attempt to boil down all this cant, I’ve defined the four principal Ideals of the creed as Social Justice, Peace, Equality and Community. As we’ve already seen, Social Justice means political violence, and Peace means victory. We’ll get to Equality and Community shortly.
Read on for the rest of idea at his blog.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: cryptocalvinism, Universalism | Leave a comment »