Here is a comment he made at CPS:
One of the useful features of 5GW is that it is a reminder that war is a full spectrum conflict. However, any replacement term for 5GW should indicate what 5GW is.
My spin on 5GW has been:
1. It would normally be described as politicking.
2. However, its intent is hostile and its intent is hidden. It is this combination of hostile intent and hidden intent makes 5GW war.
3. It is a war of influence.
4. If violence is involved, it is triggered through influence and politicking that induces someone else to conduct the violence. Violence is always indirect.I think the defining element of 5GW is deception. Any name change should reflect that.
That being said, it’s probably stuck as 5GW, especially when Dan’s book comes out.
Filed under: 5GW |
I get status updates for WFZ — hopefully it will be out sooner rather than later!
My upcoming post in the round-table will put 5GW in another perspective…
We are living this right now in the USA. I wish people could see it. People need to read the Joint Chiefs Vision 2020 document to see how our own top brass have turned against the American people. It’s outrageous!
Tom, Help me out…what in the doc are you referring to?
Here is the link to JV2020:
Click to access jv2020_a.pdf
I guess I need to read it.
Yeah, JV2020 repeats about a dozen times how Invisible Warfare (IW) has now been authorized domestically. Our top military brass have chose the side of the global oligarchs, that is now totally obvious by inspecting their own publicly available writings, just read through the double speak.
Tom…I have read through it. I think we are reading different documents. Can you quote a section or give a page number?
That link is broken.
This works:
Click to access joint_vision_2020.pdf
From http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=45289
It sounds like Hi Tech 3GW/2GW.
I will read the PDF before any further commenting.